The big sports channels announced a deal earlier this week that would launch a mega sports streaming service later this year. This includes Disney, Fox, and Warner Bros Discovery, which would see 14 live sports channels in a single streaming service. Now, local Fox and ABC stations are voicing their opinion about this new service. And to no one’s surprise, they want money.
Gray Television, which owns and operates around 113 local TV stations that cover about 36% of the United States, put out a statement about the incoming sports streamer. Stating that “Gray welcomes any venture that expands the reach of local broadcasting stations, which in turn supports the ability of local stations to maintain trusted local news operations that benefit everyone.”
Advertisement
Advertisement
Gray also explains that in this streaming service, the local signals of ABC and FOX broadcasts would be used, which is owned by local broadcasters like Gray. The company also noted that “local affiliated stations not only carry nationally televised sports but also provide local sports coverage, local news and weather, local jobs, and extensive community support.”
Fubo has also raised concerns about the new service
Gray Television isn’t the only one upset with this announcement, and so is Fubo. They are worried that this new venture, which is a pretty heavily sports-focused streaming TV service, would undercut them. Especially where companies like Disney force TV streamers like Fubo to pay them more for carriage to include ESPN in their bundle. Typically, companies that own multiple channels will force carriage agreements to include all of their channels. This is a big reason why cable and streaming TV have gotten so expensive over the past decade.
Advertisement
With this venture, Fubo says that Disney would be cutting out the middleman, which is Fubo in this instance. That would allow Disney to undercut Fubo, YouTube TV, Sling TV, and others by offering ESPN itself versus forcing those TV services to offer it along with a number of other Disney-owned channels.
While this venture is supposed to launch by the end of the year – actually this fall, likely in time for the 2024-25 NBA and NHL seasons – it’s pretty clear that it is going to face a lot of backlash, unfortunately. It’s a good move for consumers but not for companies, and it could squash competition. And that won’t be good for consumers in the long run.
Will Local TV Channels stand in the way of Fox & ESPN’s Mega Sports Streamer?
- Advertisment - 
Recent Comments
on Army vs. Coastal Carolina live stream, how to watch online, CBS Sports Network channel finder, odds
on AL Rookie of the Year Julio Rodriguez Spreads Joy and Sportsmanship to the Youth of Loma de Cabrera
on After UFC Fallout, Conor McGregor Offers a Valuable Piece of Advice to Free Agent Francis Ngannou
on Dubai International Airport sees 41.6 million passengers in first half of year, more than in 2019
on Devout athletes find strength in their faith. But practicing it and elite sports can pose hurdles
on Despite strong Lunar New Year holiday data, consumer spending in China isn’t roaring back just yet
on Dave Portnoy: Taylor Swift’s security should ‘drag Kim Kardashian to jail’ if she attends Eras Tour
on CONCEPT ART: New Details Revealed for Disney Cruise Line Lookout Cay at Lighthouse Point Destination
on “Completely Knocked Me Out”: Rob Lowe Recalls Boxing Match With Tom Cruise On 1983 Brat Pack Classic
on CBS Sports, Serie A announce new TV rights deal; Paramount+ to air over 400 Italian soccer matches
on Cam Newton’s Violent Public Incident Draws Hilarious Reaction From 3x All-Star: “Where Do I Sign Up
on Boston College vs. Army live stream, how to watch online, CBS Sports Network channel finder, odds
on Angel Reese Launches Foundation Dedicated To Empowering Women Through Sports & Financial Literacy
on A weaker dollar, skyrocketing prices and ‘record’ visitor numbers: Good luck in Europe this summer